Advanced Art of Cosmetic Surgery:  Thomas M. DeWire, MD, FACS, Surgery Center and Spa,  3974 Springfield Road, Glen Allen, VA, 23260, Richmond, Virginia, USA

  

Advanced Art of Cosmetic Surgery

Thomas M. DeWire, Sr., MD, FACS

Specializing in Cosmetic Plastic Surgery

Richmond, Virginia, USA

Body Contouring

Cleavage Determinants  - Page 2

 

Cleavage Determination in Breast Augmentation:  
On the previous page, cleavage determinants relating to the native chestwall shape  were  discussed.    On  this page the impact of the presence, or absence, of fatty soft tissues, and   position of the nipples, and breast mounds,  relative  to the sternal midline,  are considered. 

Thin Chestwall Tissues with Little Fat:

A  37 year old  with  very  thin tissues is shown  before and after  trans-ax  augmentation with smooth saline  implants. Notice the  breast  shape and natural   slope,   despite   very thin  tissues.  The lack  of  fatty tissues  in   the  transition  from breasts to sternum causes the space between the breasts to appear a  bit  wide.   Vertically oversized   pockets   allow  for the natural shape, and help to prevent rippling in this patient.
Age:   37 
Ht: 5 '8 "   Wt: 122   lbs.  Approach:  Trans-axillary
Implants:  Mentor Saline 
Type: Smooth Round           Submuscular          
Volume:   350cc bilateral
Size:  36C 

Oblique  view shows good shape with no evidence of rippling

The   implant   shape  is  more apparent   due  to   the  lack of soft tissues of  the  breast and chest.   Fatty  tissues  hide the outline   of   the  implants,  and soften  the look of  the result in breast  augmentation.  Still  no ripples are seen in this patient as  a  result  of   the  oversized pockets which allow  a natural shape  of  the  breasts.

Widely Positioned Breasts

A   25  year  old    with   widely spaced      breasts    is    seen before and after trans-axillary breast  augmentation. Note  the  natural  shape  and slope  of  the  breasts,   but  a moderately  wide  separation between  the  breasts  due  to the    broad   spacing   of   the breasts pre-op. The implants must be centered behind  the nipples.   If  the implants were to lie  closer,  then the nipples would  lie  too  far to the sides on  the  breast  mounds.
Age:  26 
Ht:  5'6 "   Wt: 120   lbs.  Approach:  Trans-axillary
Implants:  Mentor Saline     
Type: Smooth Round  Submuscular       
Volume:   425cc bilateral
Size: 34C/D
Natural    slope   and   breast mound shapes are aided by development of the vertically oversized  pockets.
A  side  view  of   the  same patient before and after the trans-axillary augmentation.

                        Back to the first page of Cleavage Determinants

Related  Breast Augmentation Links: To Other photo Illustrated Procedures:

Important  Information  About  Implant  Breast  Enlargement

Important Information about Silicone Breast Implant Use

Trans-Axillary Breast Augmentation
Trans-Axillary Breast Incisions Scars
Breast Augmentation Shape Evolution
Breast Augmentation Shape Determination
Cleavage Determinants
Post-Op Implant Massage Technique
Implants Over versus Under the Muscle
Special Considerations in Augmentation
Breast Surgery in African American Women
Breast Augmentation FAQs
Breast Augmentation with Mastopexy    Breast Lift
Revision Surgery for Augmentation Problems
Nipple Reduction/Shaping
Mastopexy or Breast Lift
Information for Out-of-Town Guests

Body Contouring

Facial Cosmetic Surgery

Main Page

Maps to Office

Information for Out-of-Town Guests

Site Map

Thomas M. DeWire, Sr., MD, FACS  E-Mail Dr DeWire
Advanced Art of Cosmetic Surgery
3974 Springfield Road
Glen Allen (Richmond), VA  23060
804-290-0200
ASPRS Logo
Terms of Use
©Copyright 1997-2007   Advanced Art of Cosmetic Surgery: Thomas M. DeWire, Sr, MD, FACS   Revised   October 29, 2007 04:05 PM

Advanced Art of Cosmetic Surgery:  Thomas M. DeWire, MD, FACS, Surgery Center and Spa,  3974 Springfield Road, Glen Allen, VA, 23260, Richmond, Virginia, USA